Month: January 2022

FDA Asks the Court to Delay First 55,000 Page Production Until May and Pfizer Moves to Intervene in the Lawsuit

By Aaron Siri   January 27, 2022


As explained in prior posts, in a lawsuit seeking all of the documents the FDA relied upon to license Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine, a federal judge shot down the FDA’s requested rate of 500 pages per month and instead ordered the FDA to produce at the rate of 55,000 pages per month starting on March 1. 

Since the government has trillions of dollars of our money, it is putting it to good use by fighting to assure that the public has the least amount of transparency possible.  To that end, it has now asked the Court to make the public wait until May for it to start producing 55,000 pages per month and, even then, claims it may not be able to meet this rate. 

The FDA’s excuse?  As explained in the brief opposing the FDA’s request, the FDA’s defense effectively amounts to claiming that the 11 document reviewers it has already assigned and the 17 additional reviewers being onboarded are only capable of reading at the speed of preschoolers. 


As the FDA tries to obtain months of delay, guess who just showed upon in the lawsuit?  Yep, Pfizer.  And it is represented by a global chair and team from a law firm with thousands of lawyers.  Pfizer’s legal bill will likely be multiple times what it would cost the FDA to simply hire a private document review company to review, redact, and produce the documents at issue.  Within weeks, if not days.

Pfizer is coming in as a third party.  But Pfizer assures the Court it is here to help expedite production of the documents.  Sure it is!  Where was Pfizer before the Court ordered the 55,000 pages per month?  Right, doing what it normally does: letting the government work on its behalf – like the way the government mandates, promotes, and defends Pfizer’s product. 

But the government did not please Pfizer this time and so here it comes, likely looking for a second bite at the apple.  Of course the FDA consented to Pfizer appearing.  You can read the response my firm filed to Pfizer’s motion , as well as all of the other relevant recent filings in the link provided below. 

Read more: FDA Asks the Court to Delay First 55,000 Page Production Until May and Pfizer Moves to Intervene in the Lawsuit

Canadian Children Brainwashed to Call Police on the Unvaccinated

Video source:TruthVideos1984

Military leaders saw pandemic as unique opportunity to test propaganda techniques on Canadians, Forces report says

A plan devised by the Canadian Joint Operations Command relied on propaganda techniques similar to those employed during the Afghanistan war.

By David Pugliese  •  Ottawa Citizen

Published: Sep 27, 2021 |  September 27, 2021  


Lt.-Gen. Mike Rouleau Photo by Adrian Wyld /The Canadian Press

Canadian military leaders saw the pandemic as a unique opportunity to test out propaganda techniques on an unsuspecting public, a newly released Canadian Forces report concludes.

The federal government never asked for the so-called information operations campaign, nor did cabinet authorize the initiative developed during the COVID-19 pandemic by the Canadian Joint Operations Command, then headed by Lt.-Gen. Mike Rouleau.

But military commanders believed they didn’t need to get approval from higher authorities to develop and proceed with their plan, retired Maj.-Gen. Daniel Gosselin, who was brought in to investigate the scheme, concluded in his report.

The propaganda plan was developed and put in place in April 2020 even though the Canadian Forces had already acknowledged that “information operations and targeting policies and doctrines are aimed at adversaries and have a limited application in a domestic concept.”

A copy of the Dec. 2, 2020, Gosselin investigation, as well as other related documents, was obtained by this newspaper using the Access to Information law.

The plan devised by the Canadian Joint Operations Command, also known as CJOC, relied on propaganda techniques similar to those employed during the Afghanistan war. The campaign called for “shaping” and “exploiting” information. CJOC claimed the information operations scheme was needed to head off civil disobedience by Canadians during the coronavirus pandemic and to bolster government messages about the pandemic.

Read More: Military leaders saw pandemic as unique opportunity to test propaganda techniques on Canadians, Forces report says

Australia has recorded 12 times more Deaths in 10 months due to the Covid-19 Vaccines than Deaths due to all other Vaccines combined in 51 years

By The Exposé on January 11, 2022

Data published by Australia’s Medicine Regulator confirms that there have been twelve times as many deaths reported as adverse reactions to the Covid-19 vaccines over a period of just ten months than deaths reported as adverse reactions to every other available vaccine combined over a period of 51 years.


The Department of Health Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) is the medicine regulator for the Australian Government, and as part of the Department of Health, the TGA regulates the quality, supply, and advertising of medicines, pathology devices, medical devices, blood products and most other therapeutics.

However, a Freedom of Information request made by Doctors for Covid Ethics back in February 2021 revealed that the TGA never saw the extremely limited study data for the Pfizer mRNA Covid-19 vaccine prior to granting it emergency approval and deeming it safe to be injected into the arms of Australians.

Read More: Australia has recorded 12 times more Deaths in 10 months due to the Covid-19 Vaccines than Deaths due to all other Vaccines combined in 51 years


by Adam Piggott | January 6, 2022

Novak Djokovic

Tennis star Novak Djokovic has apparently been held up at the Australian border while attempting entry for the Australian Open in Melbourne. Djokovic has publicly refused to reveal his vaccine status, which is resistance speak for, I didn’t submit to putting your poison goop in my arm. The Australian government has declared that he is barred from entry but don’t hold your breath on that being the last hurrah as the official Australian government position is always along the lines of, will the important parts of the world still like us?

Just why Djokovic would so badly want to enter Kangaroo Gulag is somewhat beyond me. Yes, it’s his job but it’s not like he’s hard up for coin. What I do find interesting is how revealing this sudden little drama is of wider public beliefs at this point in time.

The primary criticism of Djokovic is not that he has refused to take the clot shot. That is merely a symptom of his greater mental disease. Rather, this man has had the very public effrontery to not believe in science. Djokovic is “anti-science” in the realm of public opinion. Being anti-science on the surface seems to indicate that you do not believe in the glories of heart transplants and the like. But what it actually means in practice is that you will not get with the program.

The “pro-science” position is based on rhetoric rather than logic. If it were based on logic then Djokovic’s bargaining chip of using the fact that he is recovered from Covid and thus immune would have been accepted as this approach is recognised in several European countries. But not in Australia. So, it seems that “science” does not cross international borders. Which means that the “science” that they keep going on about is subjective rather than objective. It is science based on feelings and propaganda rather than facts and logic. It has been this way for many many years except they previously did their best to obfuscate it.

If you believe in science then what you are saying is that you believe in this world rather than God. Believing in science is thus a religion but a profoundly insecure one. Science has been contradicting itself and throwing away previous certainties for centuries. A science believer is completely impotent; he has no agency of any kind, even if he is an actual scientist. He depends on being told what is reality and what to believe in on a daily and ever changing basis. In order to mentally survive such an existence, one must willingly suspend all mental capacity for critical thinking. This is chaos. Supreme chaos. And it ends in despair.

The wonderful thing about Christianity is that God wants us to freely choose Him. He could force us, but where would the satisfaction in that be for Him? God wants willing participants in His work and plan. Yes, we must believe and have faith. But the word of God is the word of God. The Ten Commandments don’t get updated every generation when new information comes to light. They are just as applicable to us as they were to all those who came before us. We are the same as our ancestors, we just have pretty toys to play with and indoor plumbing.

The god of science wants us to be proud in our modernity. To disparage our ancestors as less than human in their actions and thoughts. We are better because we believe in science, goes the dogmatic line. Which means that you believe in nothing because those that will come in a hundred years will be told to look back at us as equally backward and unacceptable while they tear down the statues erected in this time.

This is the moment for real choosing. Do you believe in science or do you believe in God? You can’t have it both ways. You can’t sit astride some agnostic science/god fence procrastinating until “more information comes to light”. The gods of today are greedy and insatiable. If you’re not with them, you’re against them.

Is Djokovic a man of God? I do not know, but if he is not then he is at least on his own journey to arrive at that destination. So pray for him, and pray for all those who swallow the lies that they might somehow be illuminated with God’s grace and awaken from this terrible spell that has captured so many with its siren calls.

Originally published at: